[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27″][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text]<\/p>\n
SensrTrx is a well-known manufacturing analytics platform based in St. Louis, Missouri. It calculates OEE, tracks downtime, and integrates with ERP systems like Epicor, Infor, and NetSuite. For manufacturers with modern PLCs and robust shop-floor connectivity, SensrTrx delivers solid dashboards and reporting. But a growing number of manufacturers are searching for a SensrTrx alternative OEE<\/strong> solution \u2014 and the reasons reveal a fundamental gap in the software-only approach to OEE monitoring.<\/p>\n SensrTrx is a capable analytics platform. Its strengths include ERP integration (bidirectional data flow with major manufacturing ERPs), customizable dashboards and pivot table reports, cost tracking tied to downtime and scrap, production calendars and team tracking, and a mobile app for downtime notifications. For a plant that already has its PLCs networked and producing clean, structured data \u2014 SensrTrx can turn that data into actionable OEE insights. Its dashboard-first approach appeals to operations directors who want a central view across shifts and lines.<\/p>\n The friction points that drive manufacturers to search for SensrTrx alternatives fall into four categories \u2014 all rooted in the same architectural reality: SensrTrx is software that depends on data from other systems.<\/p>\n Problem 1: PLC dependency.<\/strong> SensrTrx collects machine data either through PLC integration or through manual operator entry. If a machine has a modern PLC with an accessible OPC-UA or Ethernet\/IP interface, the integration works. But many production floors \u2014 especially in small and mid-size manufacturers \u2014 have a mixed equipment base. A CNC machine from 2020 sits next to a hydraulic press from 1995. The newer machine has a Siemens or Fanuc controller with network capability. The older press has no PLC at all, or a legacy PLC with no network interface. SensrTrx cannot collect automatic data from the older machine. It falls back to manual entry \u2014 which means incomplete data.<\/p>\n Problem 2: micro-stop blindness.<\/strong> Even with PLC integration, SensrTrx typically captures stops based on PLC-reported cycle events or operator-declared downtime. Short stops \u2014 3 seconds to 3 minutes, caused by jams, sensor misfires, material misfeeds \u2014 rarely trigger a PLC stop event or an operator declaration. These micro-stops are invisible to software-only platforms. Yet on high-cadence lines (packaging, filling, labeling, assembly), they frequently account for 15 to 25 percent of total production time lost.<\/p>\n Problem 3: data completeness.<\/strong> When the system relies on operator entry for any part of the data (downtime reasons, reject counts, speed overrides), completeness depends on operator discipline. Industry data consistently shows that manual downtime logging achieves 40 to 55 percent completion rates in most plants. The Pareto analysis built on 50 percent of the data is a Pareto of what was reported, not a Pareto of what actually happened.<\/p>\n Problem 4: deployment timeline.<\/strong> Deploying SensrTrx requires PLC integration work (mapping signals, configuring data points, testing connectivity) for each machine. For a plant with heterogeneous equipment, this integration project can take weeks to months \u2014 and often requires external automation integrators.<\/p>\n TeepTrak approaches OEE monitoring from the machine side rather than the software side. Instead of depending on PLC data or operator entry, TeepTrak deploys non-invasive physical sensors \u2014 current clamps on power cables, photoelectric sensors at product exits, magnetic sensors on rotating parts \u2014 directly on or near the equipment.<\/p>\n Automatic state detection.<\/strong> The sensors detect machine running\/stopped state at one-second resolution. No PLC required. No operator input needed for state detection. The system knows when a machine stops and starts \u2014 regardless of the machine’s age, brand, or control architecture.<\/p>\n Full micro-stop capture.<\/strong> Every stop of 3 seconds or longer is recorded. On a packaging line, TeepTrak routinely reveals 1.5 to 2.5 hours per shift of accumulated micro-stops that no software-only platform would detect \u2014 because the stops were never reported to the PLC or logged by an operator.<\/p>\n 48-hour deployment.<\/strong> A single machine takes approximately one hour to instrument. No production shutdown, no equipment modification, no PLC programming. A full line can be live and producing OEE data within 48 hours of sensor installation.<\/p>\n JEMBA AI pattern detection.<\/strong> TeepTrak’s AI engine (JEMBA) analyzes second-by-second sensor data to identify patterns invisible in aggregated data \u2014 micro-stop frequency correlating with cumulative output (suggesting material buildup or thermal drift), fault cycles correlating with maintenance intervals (suggesting PM frequency is insufficient), shift-level performance variance (suggesting training gaps).<\/p>\n SensrTrx remains a solid option when your entire machine fleet has modern, networked PLCs with accessible data points, when ERP integration is your primary requirement (you need OEE data flowing into Epicor or NetSuite), when micro-stops are not a significant loss category in your process, and when you have internal or contracted automation engineering resources to handle PLC integration.<\/p>\n TeepTrak is the better choice when your equipment base is mixed (old and new machines, different control brands, some machines with no PLC), when micro-stops are a potential or known issue (packaging, filling, labeling, high-cadence assembly), when you need data fast (weeks, not months), when operator data entry reliability is a recurring problem, and when your priority is reducing machine downtime rather than building an enterprise analytics platform.<\/p>\n Yes. TeepTrak and SensrTrx are not mutually exclusive. Some manufacturers use SensrTrx for enterprise-level analytics and ERP integration, and TeepTrak for the shop-floor sensor layer that feeds precise machine data into the analytics stack. TeepTrak’s data can be exported via API. The question is not “which one” but “what problem am I solving first.”<\/p>\n TeepTrak provides an API for data export. It does not offer native bidirectional ERP connectors in the same way SensrTrx does. If your primary requirement is pushing production records into Epicor or NetSuite in real time, SensrTrx’s ERP integration is more mature. If your primary requirement is accurate machine-level OEE data, TeepTrak provides the foundation \u2014 and the data can be integrated with your ERP through the API.<\/p>\n TeepTrak’s sensors automatically detect every stop event. For stops exceeding a configurable threshold, TeepTrak’s Field V4 tablet prompts the operator to select a downtime reason from a preconfigured code list \u2014 typically completing the entry in under 3 seconds via icon selection. Completion rates average 88 to 95 percent. Micro-stops are automatically categorized by pattern (frequency, duration, station) without requiring individual operator input.<\/p>\n SensrTrx includes native cost tracking (cost per unit, cost of downtime, scrap cost). TeepTrak focuses on the operational side \u2014 OEE decomposition, Pareto analysis, pattern detection. Financial rollup can be done by exporting TeepTrak’s operational data to your existing financial systems or spreadsheets. If automated cost tracking at the machine level is a must-have, SensrTrx has an edge in this specific area.<\/p>\n The opposite. TeepTrak’s hardware deployment takes approximately one hour per machine with no production interruption. SensrTrx’s deployment depends on the PLC integration complexity \u2014 which varies widely. On machines with clean OPC-UA interfaces, SensrTrx can be configured relatively quickly. On machines with legacy or proprietary controllers, the integration effort can be substantial.<\/p>\n TeepTrak is deployed in over 450 factories across 30 countries, spanning automotive, food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, packaging, cosmetics, and general discrete manufacturing. The company is headquartered in Paris, France, with operations in China and the United States.<\/p>\n Yes. TeepTrak operates independently of any existing software system \u2014 MES, ERP, SCADA, or CMMS. It deploys its own sensors and communicates through its own platform. There is no software conflict or integration prerequisite. Many TeepTrak deployments coexist with MES systems where TeepTrak provides the machine-level OEE layer and the MES handles work orders, routing, and quality management.<\/p>\n TeepTrak customers typically see measurable OEE improvement within 2 to 4 weeks of deployment \u2014 initial quick wins from changeover optimization and downtime response acceleration. Over 3 to 6 months, the average improvement is approximately 15 OEE percentage points. For a manufacturing line running at 55 percent OEE, reaching 70 percent represents a significant increase in effective production capacity without capital expenditure on new equipment.<\/p>\n See the micro-stops your current system misses \u2014 Request a TeepTrak demo<\/a><\/p>\n For a deeper look at the sensor-based vs PLC-based data collection decision, read our guide to OEE data collection methods<\/a>. For small and mid-size discrete manufacturers evaluating OEE software, see our OEE software guide for small manufacturers<\/a>.<\/p>\nWhat SensrTrx does well<\/h2>\n
Why manufacturers look for alternatives<\/h2>\n
What a sensor-based alternative looks like: TeepTrak<\/h2>\n
When SensrTrx is the right choice<\/h2>\n
When TeepTrak is the better alternative<\/h2>\n
Can you use both?<\/h2>\n
Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n
Does TeepTrak integrate with ERP systems like SensrTrx does?<\/h3>\n
How does TeepTrak handle downtime reason coding without PLC data?<\/h3>\n
What about SensrTrx’s cost tracking and financial analytics?<\/h3>\n
Is TeepTrak harder to deploy than SensrTrx?<\/h3>\n
How many manufacturers use TeepTrak globally?<\/h3>\n
Can TeepTrak work alongside an existing MES?<\/h3>\n
What is the typical ROI timeline with TeepTrak?<\/h3>\n